Federal prosecutors announced:
… A review of most accounts held by Bernard L. Madoff’s customers when he was arrested shows that about half of the customers had not lost money because they withdrew more money than they originally invested.
Here at voluntaryXchange, this finding was anticipated 7 months ago, where I also noted that these people are committing a crime if they don’t pay the money back.
The New York Times sugar coats this though. The quote above was drawn from an article that headlined “Review Says No Net Loss for Some In Scheme”.
OMFG
- No net loss is a euphemism for profit!
- Some is not usually interpreted as “about half”!
All of these people partnered in a criminal enterprise, and yet:
Prosecutors made the revelation as they told a judge in court papers that there was no need to order restitution …
Further, in any Ponzi scheme, the chances of profiting are higher when you get in earlier. Now … go out and look at all the “victims lists” you’ve seen published. Go ahead … here’s one, and another, and there’s even a mashup map.
Not one of these sources – which include rather detailed information including names, how much was “lost”, and sometimes even juicy personal details – lists when these people started investing with Madoff. This is a critical piece of information that is probably easier to get than some of the other ones, and it is unreported.