International borders are artificial constructions. Yet, the data indicates there are macroeconomic differences on either side of, say, the border between The Netherlands and Belgium:
Why is that so?
This post is sponsored. Visit ppiclaims.uk.com for help reclaiming your mis-sold payment protection insurance.





You DO realize that any serious discussion of the relevence of borders has to include bibliographic reference to Terry Southern's CANDY, don't you?
Posted by: mike shupp | July 25, 2012 at 04:33 AM
I don't.
Candy is a bit before my time. And I wouldn't say it's stood the test of time well.
Can you tell me why it's relevant here?
Posted by: Dave Tufte | July 25, 2012 at 02:51 PM
In MY generation, everyone read CANDY. Or so it seemed. Anyhow, early in the novel, one of Candy's profs takes Candy for a ride, drives across the US-Canada border, and gives a lecture about how, while Ontario and Michigan look a lot alike, they're different places in terms of laws, etc. He's trying to seduce her by suggesting that morality is relative,and this is part of his argument. It's not terribly profound and convincing, but -- hey! -- this is a comedic soft porn novel, and realizing the prof's argument is glib bullshit as a reader while watching Candy suck it up as terribly profound is part of the comedy.
Nor is this particularly subtle -- I read CANDY either in high school or early in my college days, almost 50 years ago, and I have to confess, I was NOT a sophisticated reader in those days, but I grasped the comedy in CANDY and pretty well understood I was supposed to grasp that cmedy,
Anyhow, it's a discussion of the importance or borders that goes on at several levels, was clearly intended to do so, and manages to be funny. Everybody ought to read CANDY!
Posted by: mike shupp | July 25, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Thanks for the recommendation.
Landsburg'e The Armchair Economist got me thinking more about the pointlessness of borders.
Posted by: Dave Tufte | July 26, 2012 at 04:36 PM