This is not a rate or a percentage, so that patterns you see tell you more about where total population is, rather than where unemployment is bad. Nonetheless, it’s pretty cool:

Via I Love Charts.
Cross-posted from SUU Macroblog, which is required reading for my advanced macroeconomics students, and optional reading for those in my Principles classes.





Might be interesting to repost this map in November after the electoral map gets filled in.
Posted by: Stephen Karlson | July 09, 2012 at 08:48 AM
I don't think the data would work: these aren't unemployment rates.
So, the analogy is to something like those maps they include in atlases that place a dot everywhere so much, say, wheat is produced. It tells you where people grow wheat, but not how they're doing at that.
Same thing here: most of the states that are bright are that way because they have both a lot of unemployed people. Is that because they have a lot of population to begin with, or because their local situation is bad?
Posted by: Dave Tufte | July 09, 2012 at 04:02 PM