Macro really isn’t very different from skiing, or gymnastics, or a multitude of other activities. It looks so easy!
It isn’t.
My best friend is afraid to fly. The feeling they describe is that their continuous concentration is required for the plane to stay aloft.
And I went snowboarding for the first time this winter. I couldn’t relax on the board: my mind was tense, my body was tense, and all that did was make me wipe out. A heck of a lot of good my continuous concentration did me.
The economy is much the same way. Don Boudreaux points out in an op-ed piece entitled “Silence Golden for Market Economy” that one of the great flaws of a market economy is that its proper operation is nearly silent.
The same goes for macroeconomics: the more we hear about the economy, the less likely that it is working properly. But it gets worse: a lot of the noise comes from people who aren’t willing to leave it alone.
The metaphor we need is that the economy is like a gymnast executing a flip, or a snowboarder making sharp turns, or a plane soaring quietly seven miles up. It isn’t effortless at all. Instead, it’s quiet, and it looks simple, because it’s working.
But, what if we hear noise? Then there’s a signal extraction problem that you and I have to solve: are we hearing a failure of the economy, or the sound of someone “fixing” something that isn’t a problem? Signal extraction is the name given to ferreting out the important signal — that something’s wrong — from the unimportant ones.
Yet, this problem should be easy to solve. Given the extraordinary success of markets at making people better off — over the last 3 decades, or 3 centuries — you’d think we’d never hear of people trying to fix the market at all. And yet … this is most of what we hear out of D.C., or any government office, anywhere, anytime. This behavior is analogous to driving your car successfully to your destination, and deciding when you get there that it would run better if you went out and made the tires rounder.
It’s asinine, and we should know better. We don’t. Boudreaux finishes with a great point:
Unlike in politics, market participants do not confiscate the property of others. Unlike in politics, where those with the most votes get to take unilaterally from those with the fewest votes, in markets, even those with the most money are prevented from unilaterally taking even from those with the least money.
Government officials can demand the privilege of fixing stuff that isn’t broken. And unlike the rich, they don’t even have to make it worth your while.