Stewart at Intergalactic Medicine Show looks like a millenial from his photo. He’d never seen the original Star Trek:
Being a lifelong fan of Star Wars, I grew up with science fiction being firmly rooted in action and spectacle. What little I'd seen of Star Trek seemed boring … having watched the original series, I find myself in the unfortunate spot of having to admit I was wrong.
He reflects:
I was honestly not expecting much from it.
I’m excerpting heavily to make the point below:
… Star Trek can be slow and often falls on the side of the odd. …
That said, the show generally does well at turning its frequent absurdity into something watchable and often intriguing. …
… The show uses quality writing to overcome its sometimes zany premises.
There are countless episodes like this one where I was skeptical going in but wound up utterly committed to the story by its ends. It's one of the most skillful uses of episodic storytelling I've ever seen in a show …
… Without fancy and expensive effects to fall back on, Star Trek instead had to rely on its writing and the strength of its actors' performances. …
… There is, simply put, a sincerity and genuineness to Star Trek that is infectious. It's intelligent but lacks cynicism. It gives grandiose speeches but also has quiet moments of personal revelation that stick with you. It's a science fiction show, but one built on a foundation of likable characters and human drama. …
My impression of this is that if I deleted all the references to Star Trek, you might think that this guy has gone in skeptical, and come out a believer, after going to a week of performances at one of the better Shakespeare companies.
P.S. Oh yeah … Star Trek had a lot of Shakespearean themes and references.
Via Newmark’s Door.




