… You may recall industrialization/capitalism/Carousel of Progress's great promise of fewer working hours, and for the most part this has come true, please observe what we have done with our increased leisure time: filled it back up with work. …
I make this point in macroeconomics classes regularly.
Continuing the same thought:
There was some consternation that evil capitalism had forced Target's employees to work all day on Thanksgiving, "no respect for tradition or family time!" But how many of them wanted to be home on Thanksgiving? The customers sure didn't …
And the result is that both progressives and conservatives can be seen making this argument:
… "But the store itself has the responsibility to respect tradition!" And only in America do we want the system to force us to do the right thing so we can take the credit.
One of our time's great sociological questions is why we filled downtime back up with work, and the reason is it's better than alcoholism. …
… Work doesn't bleed over into home because capitalism is evil, work bleeds over to home because we have no idea what else to do at home, and thank God we can blame it on work.
I’ve known about combining =index() and =match() for a few years now. It even shows up in a textbook I use:
But honestly, I’ve always been perplexed about why to use this.
One thing I’ve learned is that it is useful for “sorting” data that you can’t actually sort. I know it sounds weird, but students have told me that their employers do have worksheets of data that they don’t want sorted into different orders. And the workaround for that is these two functions.
Now Access Analytic’s The Barrow gives me three more reasons:
Here are 3 reasons why you should use INDEX/MATCH instead of VLOOKUP:
a) You can “lookup to the left”
b) You don’t get incorrect results when a column is inserted or deleted from your data
c) When used in conjunction with Tables, the formulae are a lot more meaningful.
Disclaimer: I can be a bit of a conservation scold, so I have no problem with the intention of the literature … just with its stupidity.
Anyway, this was an 8 page flyer passed out to elementary school students. It’s written for kids, but I wonder if it was written by kids as well.
My biggest complaint is with this stunner:
First it tells you to total up your number of bulbs by type. Good, so far.
If I can go so far as to use spreadsheet labeling, you’ve just filled in A1 and A2, and summed them to get A3=A1+A2.
Then it tells you to multiply those totals by the annual cost of electricity per bulb. Still good. You now have your total cost of electricity for all bulbs of each type in your house.
Continuing the spreadsheet theme, you’ve just made D1=A1*C1 (and D2=A2*C2).
Lastly, it tells you to multiply the entries in column D by the total number of bulbs (line 3). Make no mistake about it: that’s a direction to multiply by A3. This means that you’ll have E1=(A1+A2)*A1*C1 (and something similar for E2).
Yes, you’re reading that correctly: they’re telling kids that the way to measure the cost of energy is to square the number of light bulbs they have.
BTW: Column B is pointless if they’re going to direct you to use Column C.
The rest is small beer … but it sure is fun.
Efficiency just must not be selling as a buzz word these days:
Why call it wattsmart if you’re already calling it efficient? And, if it’s such a big deal to call it wattsmart … wouldn’t you title the section that way? I mean … they titled the whole booklet with it:
I’d think this already puts wattsmart above energy efficiency in the pecking order. Perhaps putting both italics and bold typefaces into one word just addled the author’s brain.
This appears alongside a graphic showing windmills, solar cells, and dams:
Yes, we make a big stink about our renewable sources of energy, and then tell the kids that we don’t use anything renewable to make electricity. Perhaps this is a Freudian slip (if I can project that behavior onto a firm).
I do sort of get the point of this one: that we turn primary/natural resources into a secondary/useful resource:
But having said that, is it OK to call electricity a resource? And, if, say coal and the electricity from coal are both resources, aren’t you double-counting?
Here’s how to keep the heat out:
Most middle-schoolers know that once the infared radiation gets inside the window, it’s in for good. The blinds just keep it … on the other side of the blinds.
I don’t even know where to start with this one:
Hmmm. Using both crude and unrefined is repetitive. How is petroleum different from oil (again, remember the target audience)? Isn’t refined oil already a petroleum product? Is there any such thing as refined oil? Isn’t the whole point that most of it isn’t oil any more … thus the different names?
Now, I know we could quibble about this one:
But … do you know of any nuclear plants that don’t use uranium? Yes, they can use plutonium … but why not say that? Plus, to me the wording suggests that some nuclear plants might just be using coal. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a subsidy scheme in Europe that can make that a viable alternative.
This is really a disaster:
Hydropower is not “energy from water”. It’s the conversion of the potential energy of water at one altitude into kinetic energy by letting it drop to a lower altitude. In short, it’s capturing gravity with water.
From the department of redundancy department:
Read that one again: “Wind is energy from the wind”. Yes, it really does say that.
Now perhaps I’m a little nitpicky we these, but it seems to me if you’re going to give a bullet list under a heading, the first item shouldn’t be repeating or defining the heading:
I didn’t selectively edit those: reuse and recycle have one suggestion, but reduce only has an alternative definition.
Here’s how to save water (I can see that the power company might want me to save hot water, but not just any water):
That’s right! The glass is half-full with less water, and half-empty with more air.
You’re gonna’ love this one. They recommend you use CFL’s instead of incandescent bulbs. Fair enough … but we all know about the disposal issues, and they’ve go that covered:
Go ahead, click this link http://www.getenergysmart.org. It redirects an interested junior CFL recycler in the intermountain west to this New York State government site … with 355 words … not one of which is either CFL or disposal. If you put in “CFL disposal” into its search bar, you do get 3 links on the same site, and if you click through again … you get a map of places to safely dispose your CFL’s in New York. I’ll make sure to have the vXgirl bring any dead CFL’s I have in Utah when I visit Buffalo. Oh … one thing … where do I found out if it’s safe to bring a CFL in her Hello Kitty luggage?
And omigosh … it gets so much better. It shows a map of New York, and a text box where you can enter your zip code. And if you enter one that’s not in New York … it crashes!
And you gotta’ love the ending:
That’s right kids! If you fill out the survey about how to save energy, we’ll give you a nightlight to save less of it!
N.B. I wrote this a year ago, and am posting it now that my daughter is out of that grade and school.
Oregon State University researchers flew drones this summer over potato fields to monitor for disease. Oregon nurseries have also partnered with researchers to test unmanned technology to count potted trees.
In Florida, farmers and researchers have used small unmanned helicopters equipped with infrared cameras to monitor orange trees for the deadly citrus greening, a bacterial disease that kills the trees. Greening begins at the top of the tree.
The author of the article is clearly focused on farming; there’s nothing about ranching. Imagine the usefulness of drones to finding cattle that are on the open range, or of delivery water or hay to where the cows are waiting for it (for those not from the West, free range cattle do remember where supplies were last dropped in the winter, and will congregate in those spots … often miles from nowhere in particular).
With the development of internet technology, work at home jobs are increasing in the market. Also setting up small business online with ones own bank savings can provide excellent work at home opportunities. Apart from savings, banks offer0 credit card to cater to short term finance needs. Partial tax payments like tax credits are also available to promote online businesses. Market now offers several alternatives to traditional credit card debt which are helpful to work at home businesses.