Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz


  • Accident Compensation

  • Save money when shopping online, visit Coupon croc for the latest discount codes and vouchers.

  • See blogs and businesses for USA

  • Southern Utah University

  • Search Now:
    In Association with
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2004

« Best Critique of the Labor Theory of Value, Bar None | Main | MIT Weblog Survey »


Charley Foster

It’s not just about taking from the poor to give to the rich. It cuts the other way too. In fact, one of two landmark Court decisions signaling a shift in the standard from actual “public use” to mere “public purpose” upheld a statute in Hawaii allowing the state to condemn property owned by landlords and convey it to tenants. The state claimed property was too highly concentrated in the hands of a few owners and the public purpose of the legislation was to correct a perceived malfunctioning land market. O’Connor wrote the decision. (Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984)).

Dave Tufte

I had heard about this. I have two thoughts.

1) What we are seeing here may be richness in political power as opposed to money.
2) Hawaii may be a special case, given the concentration of power from it's colonial stage.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Reading

  • The Earthsea Cycle
  • From Archetype to Zeitgeist

Non-Economics Blogroll

Gone but not Forgotten


Movie Rating